Why is my eotech fuzzy

One thing that you are going to love about the EOTech reticles is their distinctiveness. Specifically, you can distinguish the reticles without the use of magnification. Moreover, the reticles are compatible with other platforms, too. There are various types of reticles that the EOTech offers.

They have different functionalities but using them should still follow the same operation. Check them below. Inarguably, this particular reticle pattern is the most sought options by shooters in the world today. The reason for its popularity is due to its insane capability for quick target acquisition. It has three functional aim points that are compatible with various loads such as the. Of course, other calibres can also use this reticle.

However, the user has to adjust the ranges based on the aim points manually. Take note that the centre of the ring is the aiming point for both 50 yards and yards. Meanwhile, the lowest point is the one that you should use for shots that are within the 7-yard distance. Another reticle pattern that you can opt from EOTech is the two-dot model.

Just like the first one, you can easily distinguish this reticle without the help of magnification. It is still capable of quick target acquisition with extreme stability and precision. It has four aim points that you can use. The same with the one dot reticle, the central aiming point should be used for clocking 50 yards and yards targets. Any idea on turnaround time for EOTech? I've noticed this on brand new in the box, in the store EO Techs.

I think it's just the nature of the beast. That's why I've never cared for them. Anyway, you're never gonna get it to look as crisp and clear as it does on Call of Duty I believe mine xps2 gets pretty crisp when you lower the brightness I also believe they work better with natural light opposed to indoor lighting I don't think Call of Duty can get as crisp as my xps Because of the fact that they are done with lasers, they will always have a "blurry" or pixelated look.

If you use it the way its suppose to be used, it will help negate that issue. By that I mean mounted farther forward on the rifle and using it both eyes open. Also I remember reading a test that concluded that some people just see a really big blur, and some see it really clear.

Everyones different. Diabetes is a bitch. You are a health care professional you should be able to differential diagnose. I've also heard that astigmatism affects visual perception of reticles The 6th pic in this listing would be a great example: Click That reticle is very crisp, and not fuzzy at all.

My reticle is the polar opposite of that, and they were both manufactured the same month, and are the exact same models. Is this kind of variation typical, or is mine atypical? Usually due to brightness being too high or having an astigmatism. This is odd. The reticle is totally saturated. Quote History. Quoted: Usually due to brightness being too high or having an astigmatism. It's every bit as fuzzy no matter what brightness setting it's on.

Even in the pic I took, it's maybe at a medium brightness setting there. I'll once again reference the pic from that sales thread I linked. That reticle is crisp and flawless. My reticle is insanely fuzzy on any brightness setting with any background. Mine looks fuzzy too Thought it was normal compared to a sharp scope reticle or something. Quoted: is the reticle still fuzzy when viewed through the rear sight? I'll add that I tried to manipulate the reticle in several different ways for a good 15 mins before I tossed the rifle back in the safe with the optic.

In reference to that reticle pic I linked that I'm comparing it to My reticle is like the binary version of what that reticle is. That's the best way I can describe it. It's not a solid line that makes up the circle ring like that linked reticle. Hence why I call it the binary version.

Not sure a better way to describe it. It looks terrible. It's not just fuzzy. As said, the ring itself isn't even a solid line like that other reticle.

It literally looks a bunch of tiny little dots next to each other. At any brightness, from any angle, against any background, etc. Hence why I've said that the pic actually makes it look much better.

The pic just illustrates the fuzziness. You would totally think my reticle was the Barska or Chinese knockoff version of this optic by comparing the two reticles. The picture really doesn't show much, as the camera is focused on the optic. You need to focus the camera at infinity, so that distant objects and the reticle are in focus.

EOTech reticles are slightly "fuzzy". Looking through the EOTech, when you focus your eyes on a distant target, the reticle should look like it's made up of thousands of tiny dots. Quoted: The picture really doesn't show much, as the camera is focused on the optic.