How do i prove i wasnt speeding

This is a specific scenario, but i had a friend who was going the opposite direction as the cop was. Cops flips a bitch, pulls him over. It is also impossible to GET accurate radar while moving. So he got out of that ticket instantly because i guess people usually accept the ticket, never questioning a cop. That same cop kept pulling him over for the next year, claiming he had illegally modified parts in his car over and over. The bitter cop did not stop this until he got a new car.

So be warned, there may be a downside. Just the other day, I made really good small talk with the police officer. In fact, both he and I smiled in our conversation. Then he walked back to his car and came back out with a ticket. He told me to have a nice day. I got my ticket significantly reduced while speeding on the highway. Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website.

Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent.

You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Necessary Necessary. Functional Functional.

Performance Performance. Analytics Analytics. Advertisement Advertisement. Others Others. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". More importantly, I found that my phone only recorded a top speed of just 26 miles per hour, significantly lower than the cited speed.

I now knew I was not speeding. After heading to the Yolo County California Traffic Court website and doing some research I found that I had two options: traffic court or a fine with traffic school. Most friends and family suggested paying the fines and avoiding traffic court since it is usually impossible to win. I unfortunately did not have the cash to spare or time for traffic school with a busy college schedule.

I soon decided to take my chances in traffic court, which would take place over six months down the road. I decided to write down an account of the entire situation just a few days later and even exported the data from my phone to Google Docs so I would not lose or forget any important details.

I saved a few articles to back my claim that my account of the situation was debatable with the evidence from my smart phone. Once I made my way into the court room after going through metal detectors, I had to sign a document to indicate whether I plea guilty or not guilty.

I choose the latter and got seated. The judge called a few people to the stand before it was my turn. Most of them were wearing rugged clothing, screamed out loud a several times, uttered inappropriate language, and were extremely enraged.

Each case resulted in a guilty verdict, which had me even more terrified. I eventually took the stand nervously. The plaintiff presented information from city plans noting that my speed limit was inappropriate for the area. When it was my turn to make a statement, I remained calm and spoke respectfully. I was also glad that I wore business casual clothing, which always plays an important role in situations such as this one.

Taking hints from a lawyer that spoke on behalf of a defendant shortly before me, I decided to ask the officer a few questions about the day he cited me. I then presented my time stamped GPS data with details about my average moving speed and maximum speed during my short drive home. Both numbers were well within the posted speed limits. I also made it clear to the judge that I had no other prior driving records or violations. After a lengthy pause, the judge asked how I obtained the GPS tracking information.

I provided a detailed explanation about my new awesome smart phone, the application in use, and how I exported the data. After questioning whether the data was reliable, I mentioned the in progress Sonoma County Superior Court trial regarding the same matter about the credibility of both technologies.

The judge took a moment and declared that I was not guilty, but he had an unusual statement that followed. Before anyone goes out to try their luck with my story, I should make a few things clear. I have no legal experience what so ever. I also would like to also note that the purpose of this article is to focus on smart phone technology and issues with radar guns. The officer in question was doing his job and did not do anything wrong. I find that internet culture often likes to demonize misbehaving cops, which I hate hearing about.

It is important to respect the men and women who put their lives on the line to keep our streets safe every day. With that being said, I hope that this article will be helpful to anyone who was wrongly accused due to inaccurate information from radar guns, which are rather complicated to operate compared to consumer friendly smart phones. Link: My Tracks — Android Market. Great job, and congratulations! You were likely a refreshing break from the usual poorly-dressed, disrespectful punks that show up to fight tickets because they have nothing better to do, so that helped too.

This goes to show that if you know you did nothing wrong, fight! Also, you mentioned regretting not speaking up to the cop, but you did exactly the right thing by just producing documentation, being polite and non-confrontational, and not trying to argue or dispute the ticket with the officer.

Again, congrats on beating this! Your phone had absolutely nothing to do with the judges verdict. Most departments require that radar be calibrated everyday before starting a shift. Some do it more often. If you can show reasonable doubt that the officers equipment was not working properly, then the judge cannot find a verdict of guilty. Officers and attorneys are both aware of this.

Thats why every police officer in the country calibrates his equipment daily and records that information into a log. This story strikes me as totally false. Yup, you are correct that departments require calibrating radar guns before a shift.

Unfortunately, the traffic cop in question did not have written log of those details when he took the stand. I inadvertently asked about calibration and training since a lawyer asked another officer shortly before it was my turn. Based on what you just said, it seems more likely that the judge made his decision on the lack of information rather than GPS.

However with how the case turned out, I truly felt that my smart phone evidence also played a vital role. Even if it was, the ease of fiddling even date-stamped data is trivial. The lesson here is not that the phone data was important, it was your demeanour during the appearance and your reasonable attitude and presentation of evidence. The cop could have measured you in an over-taking spurt at 40 mph even though your average was 26 mph.

In several jurisdictions, it is now illegal to interact with a cell phone while driving. But, kudos to you and a cool story. The lessons here are that all factors have a chance to contribute when presented well. Jim, how can you reliably contend that the phone data had zero tondo with the verdict?

It was evidence. Results in court are not only how one presents evidence but what the said evidence consists of. Lazy copy indeed. I have fought all of my tickets and the more evidence you have in your favor the better. There must be daily and yearly calibration logs. The gun must be inspected by an FCC licensed entity and the police department must hold an FCC license for using the radar equipment.

They have standard training, laser radar training, as well as refresher training. Beat the cop at their game — with their rules and win!. The judge could have said it had nothing to do with it, but the only person who truly knows is the judge. You call the story fake, but you strike me as someone who just thinks they know everything.

Stop hating on the author and do something positive. Completely false. You should call the police at the accident scene and obtain a copy of the police report. In addition, a police report will be helpful proof to use when you file your insurance claim. Speak to witnesses. It is crucial to get the contact information and statement of any individuals who saw your accident before they leave the scene. Third-party neutral witnesses who have no stake in your claim provide powerful evidence to convince the insurance company that you were not at fault.

Retain an attorney.