Which communities are at risk from terrorism

In conclusion, it is for the Kenyan Government and Kenyan people to work together to tackle this threat, with the international community stepping in with support where we can. The UK and Kenya have a deep mutual interest in tackling terrorist threats and we are committed to helping Kenya strengthen its capacity to do so. Unity of purpose will prevail against those that wish to hurt us, and if we speak with one voice we can achieve much.

I wish the follow-up to this conference every success in its efforts to map out a Kenyan-owned, Kenyan-delivered plan for countering violent extremism. We stand ready to support. To help us improve GOV. It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. Cookies on GOV. UK We use some essential cookies to make this website work. Accept additional cookies Reject additional cookies View cookies.

Hide this message. Home Society and culture Community and society. Location: Nairobi Delivered on: 16 January Transcript of the speech, exactly as it was delivered. Ladies and Gentlemen. This means challenging terrorist ideology. We have set up a body called the Research, Information and Communications Unit RICU which challenges and confronts terrorist ideology, providing pathways for people to explore alternatives.

It also means disrupting the activities of those who promote terrorist ideology. This is done through the work of law enforcement agencies, under existing terrorist legislation.

The Home Secretary also has powers to stop those who advance extremist narratives from entering the UK. And it means working with local communities, bringing people together to develop counter narrative projects and supporting community voices in challenging extremism. Radicalisation is a process, not an event. During that process it is possible to intervene to prevent vulnerable people being drawn into terrorist related activity.

We do that through frontline staff in key sectors, for example those involved in health, education and youth offending, have a significant role to play in identifying and supporting vulnerable individuals. Thirdly we work with sectors and institutions where there are risks of radicalisation. The police play a key role in the delivery of Prevent in the UK.

At a local level there are over Prevent Engagement Officers who connect counter terrorism policing, neighbourhood policing and communities. The Police also develop comprehensive assessments of threat, risk and vulnerability in local areas that identify priority areas and underpin the delivery plans for those areas.

Prevent is also active in other sectors including: The internet, which plays a role in perpetuating extremist and terrorist ideology.

Such efforts broaden the options available to respond to radicalization to violence occurring in the United States. However, past U. CVE programs and current terrorism prevention efforts have been controversial, driven by concerns about their potential to infringe on constitutionally protected rights or to stigmatize communities.

The effectiveness of past CVE efforts using these approaches, especially at the federal level, has been limited by modest resource investments and mistrust of these efforts by some communities.

In support of U. Researchers sought to learn from past CVE efforts and to explore possible paths forward to effective, but also practical, federal and national terrorism prevention. This research focused on policies and programs within the United States and on federal efforts in particular, although researchers also looked at available local programming, including nongovernmental organization NGO initiatives.

Researchers also focused specifically on activities related to violence — not beliefs — since individuals' freedoms of belief, religion, and political view are protected.

The research effort drew on a review of published literature and available open-source threat information; interviews with terrorism prevention experts, researchers, and members of the technology industry and nonprofit organizations; field visits with state, local, and nongovernmental organizations in five U. The figure shows five types of terrorism prevention activities that the federal government might engage in.

These activities are organized into three phases, with the early phase focusing broadly on vulnerable populations, the middle phase focusing more narrowly on individuals at risk of radicalizing to violence, and the late phase focusing on individuals who have broken the law and are already involved in the criminal justice system. The analysis found major gaps in national terrorism prevention efforts across all five types of activities. Shortfalls came not only from limited programmatic focus and resource investment, but also as a result of sustained opposition that tried to constrain or halt such efforts.

However, there have been some successes in community education and public-private partnerships, such as the Peer2Peer P2P program, which funded university students to create media campaigns to counter extremist narratives. This program was repeatedly cited by interviewees as a success story in government cooperation with NGOs.

Many interviewees viewed the recent defunding of P2P's domestically focused component as a significant missed opportunity. Some capacity to intervene with individuals at risk of radicalizing to violence has been built at the local level, often through existing intervention programs that address other violence and related concerns. For example, the Los Angeles Police Department recently launched the Providing Alternatives to Hinder Extremism program, which aims to respond to individuals at risk of perpetrating violence and, working with the mental evaluation unit, to intervene and provide counseling and other services.

This program is nested within the broader approach taken in Los Angeles to address targeted violence. Across the nation, there are other efforts that seek to address intervention for ideologically motivated violence in the context of broader existing programs.

One NGO-sponsored effort is Life After Hate, which provides crisis intervention initiatives to help people move away from racism and violent extremism.

Although federal and others' efforts to date have built some capability, these successes are viewed as fragile because of the controversy surrounding past CVE and current terrorism prevention activities and the limited funding available to support programs.

Some were as young as 14 years old, while nearly all will have been radicalised entirely online. Counter-Terrorism Policing, Year in Review Addressing the direct threat of terrorism is bolstered by broader work to tackle both violent and non-violent extremism.

We also regard calls for the death of members of our armed forces as extremist. It identifies Islamist terrorism as the principal terrorist threat to the UK, with extreme right-wing terrorism a growing concern. Threat levels are designed to give a broad indication of the likelihood of a terrorist attack. Prevent: to stop people becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism. Pursue: to stop terrorist attacks. Protect: to strengthen our protection against a terrorist attack.

Prepare: to mitigate the impact of a terrorist attack. Addressing the direct threat of terrorism through CONTEST is bolstered by broader work to tackle both violent and non-violent extremism. In addition, Community cohesion is a significant cross-government priority to build resilience and can help limit opportunities for extremists. Through working collaboratively, WECTU aims to work more effectively in its response to the threat from national and international terrorism and extremism.

If you see or hear something unusual or suspicious trust your instincts and ACT by reporting it in confidence at gov. The Terrorism Act provides the main framework for counter-terrorism powers in the UK. The Terrorism Act defines Terrorism, associated offences, and provides police powers to arrest and detain suspected terrorists, stop and search vehicles and pedestrians, and to impose parking restrictions.

It provides powers to investigate terrorism by searching premises and general powers for police, customs and immigration officers including exchange of information. Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Act widens the offences that can be classed as terror-connected, increases sentencing, provides a minimum period of 12 months on licence, and requires adult offenders to take polygraph tests.

Offenders are subject to the Registered Terrorist Offender notification requirements post-release. Prevent activity in local areas relies on the co-operation of many organisations to be effective. Chapter 1 of Part 5 of the Act underpins this co-operation with a duty on specified authorities listed in Schedule 6 to the Act , including local authorities, the police, prisons and probation providers, and education and health providers, to have due regard when performing their functions to the need to prevent people being drawn into terrorism.

Chapter 2 of Part 5 of the Act underpins the Channel arrangements. The panel must determine what support may be provided and in what circumstances. Subsections 3 and 4 amend section 36 to enable a local authority, as well as the police, to refer an individual who they believe to be vulnerable to being drawn into terrorism to a Channel panel.